Change of control software review that finds the assignment and consent clauses a deal triggers before they become a termination, a repricing, or a blocked transfer.
Our change of control software review reads every material software agreement against the actual deal structure and flags the clauses that bite. Change of control and anti assignment clauses can trigger consent, termination, or repricing. A clause that looks dormant can stop a license transferring, reset pricing to standalone rates, or hand a publisher the leverage to reopen the whole agreement. We find them before signing, while they can still be negotiated.
Deal structure decides which clauses bite. A stock purchase usually keeps the contracting entity intact but can still trip a change of control trigger. An asset purchase moves agreements to a new entity and squarely raises assignment and consent. A merger and a carve out each carry their own consequences. We read the master agreements, order forms, and amendments against the structure on the table, and we flag every clause that requires consent, allows termination, or permits repricing.
This is where indirect and inherited exposure often hides. The SAP claims against AB InBev for a reported 600 million dollars and Diageo for a reported 60 million, as reported in court filings and press coverage as of 2024, turned on indirect access through connected systems, exactly the kind of usage a change of control event can crystallise. A review that surfaces these clauses before signing lets you price the risk, secure consent, or renegotiate the term while you still have leverage.
We build a clause register across the material agreements, classify each trigger by deal structure, and rank it by commercial impact. The deliverable tells the deal team three things: which licenses transfer freely, which need publisher consent before close, and which carry a repricing or termination risk that should move price or be papered into the agreement. We provide commercial and licensing advisory and recommend your own counsel for the legal interpretation of each clause.
| Deal structure | Typical trigger | Buyer exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Stock purchase | Change of control clause | Consent or notice, possible repricing |
| Asset purchase | Anti assignment clause | Consent required to transfer the license |
| Merger | Deemed assignment | Termination or consent depending on terms |
| Carve out | Both, plus shared agreements | Standalone repricing and separation cost |
Software agreements are written to protect the publisher revenue across a change of ownership. For years a change of control or anti assignment clause sits unread, because nothing has triggered it. A deal changes that overnight. The clause that allowed quiet renewal at the old rate can now require written publisher consent, permit termination, or reset pricing to standalone rates. A buyer who has not read for these provisions can close a deal only to discover that a business critical platform cannot legally transfer, or that its cost is about to jump because the volume discount was tied to the old entity.
The review exists to surface these clauses while there is still leverage to deal with them. Before signing, a clause that requires consent can be negotiated, a repricing risk can be moved into the purchase price or the indemnity, and a termination right can be planned around. After signing, the same clause is a problem to be managed at the publisher convenience.
The same agreement behaves differently depending on how the deal is structured. A stock purchase usually keeps the contracting entity intact, but many agreements define a change of the ultimate parent as a trigger anyway. An asset purchase moves the agreement to a new legal entity and squarely raises assignment and consent. A merger can create a deemed assignment by operation of law. A carve out combines both problems and adds shared agreements that were never meant to split. We read every material agreement against the structure actually on the table, so the register reflects the deal you are doing rather than a generic checklist.
A change of control event can crystallise indirect access exposure, the same category behind the reported SAP claims against AB InBev for 600 million dollars and Diageo for 60 million, as reported in court filings and press coverage as of 2024. When systems reconnect under new ownership, usage that was previously unmetered can become a charge. The review flags where connected systems create that risk so it can be priced or renegotiated rather than inherited blind. We provide commercial and licensing advisory, not legal advice, and we recommend your own counsel for the interpretation of each clause we surface.
See the method in our change of control and assignment guide pillar, and how it plays out in practice: a change of control clause renegotiated before close, a 4 million dollar indirect access claim avoided, shared licenses separated cleanly in a divestiture. Or review the full range of services.
We review every material agreement against your structure. Send us the deal and we respond within one business day.
Book a confidential call